Model Interpretability and Explainability Techniques Explained

Model interpretability refers to how easy it is to understand how a model works. Common techniques include SHAP, LIME, PDPs and more. Learn more.

Written by Rohan Mistry
Published on Jul. 16, 2025
AI developer reviewing a machine learning model for intepretability
Image: Shutterstock / Built In
Brand Studio Logo
Summary: Machine learning models used in high-stakes decisions must be interpretable and explainable. Techniques like LIME, SHAP and PDPs help clarify model logic, build trust, and ensure accountability in fields like healthcare, finance and criminal justice.

As machine learning models become more integrated into critical decision-making processes, the ability to interpret and explain their predictions is increasingly important. Model interpretability refers to understanding how a model makes decisions, while model explainability aims to provide a human-understandable explanation of those decisions.

Model Interpretability Techniques to Know

  1. Intrinsic interpretability (decision trees, linear and logistic regression and rules-based models).
  2. LIME
  3. SHAP
  4. PDPs
  5. Permutation feature importance.

In high-stakes applications like healthcare, finance, and law enforcement, stakeholders need to trust and understand AI models. This article will explore the importance of interpretability and explainability, key techniques for achieving them, and their applications in real-world scenarios.

 

Why Model Interpretability and Explainability Matter

While complex models such as deep neural networks and ensemble methods often outperform simpler models, they are often seen as black boxes, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at a decision. This lack of transparency can lead to:

  • Bias and fairness issues: If a model makes biased decisions, it is crucial to understand why, so corrective actions can be taken.
  • Accountability: In domains like finance or healthcare, decisions made by AI must be explainable to ensure accountability and legal compliance.
  • Trust and adoption: Users and stakeholders are more likely to adopt AI systems when they can trust and understand how decisions are made.

Thus, interpretability and explainability are essential for building trustworthy AI systems.

More on Machine LearningGuide to Expectation Maximization Algorithm

 

Techniques for Model Interpretability

Interpretability can be approached in two ways: through intrinsic interpretability, which uses an inherently interpretable model, or post-hoc interpretability, which relies on techniques to explain more complex models after training.

1. Intrinsic Interpretability

These are models that are interpretable by design, meaning the internal logic behind the predictions can be easily understood without needing any additional explanation.

  • Linear regression and logistic regression: Both models are simple and produce coefficients that can be directly interpreted.
  • Decision trees: These models make decisions by splitting data at different nodes, and the decision-making process can be easily followed by tracing the tree.
  • Rule-based models: These models use a set of predefined rules for decision-making, making them highly interpretable.

2. Post-Hoc Interpretability

For more complex models like deep neural networks or ensemble methods, post-hoc interpretability techniques can help explain the model’s predictions.

1.Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME)

LIME is an approach that fits a simple, interpretable model locally around the prediction of a black-box model. It helps explain why the model made a specific prediction by approximating the decision boundary of the black-box model locally

Example: If a deep learning model classifies an image as a cat, LIME generates a simpler, interpretable model (e.g., linear regression) that approximates the black-box model’s behaviour in that local region.

2.Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) 

SHAP values provide a unified approach to explaining individual predictions. SHAP values represent how much each feature contributes to the model’s prediction, allowing you to understand the impact of each feature in the decision-making process.

Example: In a loan approval model, SHAP values can explain how features like income, credit score, and loan amount each contribute to a particular loan being approved or denied.

3. Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs)

PDPs show the relationship between a feature and the predicted outcome while holding other features constant. It is particularly useful for understanding how a feature influences the model’s prediction.

Example: PDPs can help us understand the effect of a feature like age on predicting the likelihood of a patient developing a particular disease.

4. Permutation Feature Importance 

This technique measures the importance of a feature by shuffling its values and observing how much the model’s performance decreases. A significant decrease indicates high importance.

 

Techniques for Model Explainability

Explainability goes beyond interpretation and aims to make the model’s decisions understandable to non-experts, such as business stakeholders or regulatory bodies.

1. Feature Importance

Feature importance techniques help us identify which features contribute the most to a model’s predictions. It is an important first step in explaining the behaviour of the model.

  • Random forest feature importance: Random forests can provide feature importance scores based on how often a feature is used in decision splits across all trees.
  • Gradient boosting feature importance: Similar to Random forests but uses boosting to combine multiple weak learners into a strong learner.

2. Model-Agnostic Methods

These methods can be applied to any machine learning model, providing a common ground for explainability across different algorithms.

  • Global surrogate models: A complex model (e.g., a neural network) can be approximated by a simpler, interpretable model (e.g., a decision tree) to provide insight into the overall decision process.
  • Counterfactual explanations: A counterfactual explanation provides an answer to the question, “What could have changed the outcome?” For example, for a loan rejection, a counterfactual explanation might reveal that a slight increase in income could have resulted in approval.

 

Tools for Interpretability and Explainability

Several tools have been developed to make interpretability and explainability easier for data scientists and machine learning engineers.

  • Eli5: A Python library that helps explain machine learning models and their predictions.
  • InterpretML: An open-source library that provides both interpretable models and model-agnostic interpretability methods.
  • LIME: As mentioned earlier, this tool is used for explaining the predictions of machine learning models by approximating them with interpretable models.
  • SHAP: This library helps compute SHAP values, providing clear and comprehensive explanations of individual predictions.
  • Alibi: A Python library that helps with both model-agnostic explanations and fairness analysis.

 

Real-World Applications of Interpretability and Explainability

1. Healthcare

In healthcare, interpretability and explainability are crucial for making AI-driven medical decisions, such as diagnosing diseases or recommending treatments. Doctors must trust and understand why a model recommends a certain course of action.

Example: A deep learning model predicts the likelihood of a patient having a certain disease. Using SHAP values, doctors can understand how features like age, blood pressure and medical history influence the model’s decision.

2. Finance

In finance, explainability is critical for risk assessment, fraud detection, and credit scoring. Financial institutions are often required to justify their decisions to regulators.

Example: A credit scoring model rejects a loan application. Using LIME or SHAP, the bank can explain which factors (e.g., income, credit score, existing debts) contributed to the rejection.

3. Criminal Justice

In the criminal justice system, AI is used for risk assessment and recidivism prediction. Interpretability is necessary to ensure that the predictions are not biased and are based on fair criteria.

Example: A model predicts the likelihood of a defendant reoffending. By using counterfactual explanations, the system can explain what changes in the defendant’s behaviour could have led to a different prediction.

 

Best Practices for Model Interpretability and Explainability

  • Start simple: Begin with simple models that are naturally interpretable before moving to more complex ones. Whenever possible, choose models that balance performance with interpretability.
  • Be transparent: Share the logic behind the model’s decision-making with stakeholders to foster trust and accountability.
  • Use multiple techniques: Relying on a single interpretability method may not always provide a complete picture. Combine multiple techniques (e.g., SHAP, LIME) for a better understanding.
  • Regularly validate explanations: Ensure that the explanations make sense in real-world contexts and are actionable.
A tutorial on model interpretability vs. model explainability. | Video: Data Odyssey

 

Understanding Model Interpretability and Explainability

Model interpretability and explainability are essential for building AI systems that are not only effective but also trustworthy and fair. By using techniques like LIME, SHAP and feature importance, we can better understand how models make decisions and ensure that they are transparent, accountable and accessible to stakeholders.

As machine learning models become more pervasive in critical applications, making them interpretable and explainable is no longer optional — it is a necessity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Model interpretability is the degree to which a human can understand how a machine learning model makes its decisions. It refers to the clarity and transparency of the internal mechanics of a model — particularly how input features influence outputs

  1. Intrinsic interpretability (Linear and logistic regression, decision trees and rules-based models).
  2. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME)
  3. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)
  4. Partial dependence plots (PDPs)
  5. Permutation features

Interpretability typically refers to how well a human can understand the mechanics of a model, while explainability focuses on how well a model’s outputs can be justified to a stakeholder. The terms are often used interchangeably, but explainability usually emphasizes post-hoc reasoning and communication, especially for complex or black-box models.

Explore Job Matches.