Cedar

HQ
New York
420 Total Employees
190 Product + Tech Employees
Year Founded: 2016

Cedar Innovation & Technology Culture

Updated on June 30, 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Innovation Pace

We are building products that other healthcare companies aren't attempting. Our Director of Applied AI and ML points to our machine learning discounts feature — which personalizes affordability options for patients based on predictive modelling — as an example of taking on technically risky, industry-advancing work that meaningfully changed outcomes for both clients and patients.


We launched Kora, our AI voice agent, using a head-to-head bake-off between an in-house build and a vendor SDK — launching both simultaneously to make a data-driven architecture decision. We hold hackathons regularly, and our CTO describes a meaningful evolution over the past two years: AI-native thinking has spread from a small core team to across the entire engineering organization.
 

Adoption of Emerging Tech

We are deliberate about adoption — not reactive, but not slow. A Principal Engineer describes our approach as one of "open-minded curiosity," where we have a good finger on the pulse of longer trends and short-term signals alike. We make measured decisions about what to adopt and when, especially in healthcare where thoughtfulness is required.


That said, when we commit, we move fast. Our CTO describes the AI-native transformation of our engineering team over the past two years: from a small cohort building our first generative AI product to a posture where virtually every team is incorporating AI-native thinking into how they build and ship. We fund bets, run hackathons, and have created infrastructure like our Friendly Neighborhood Staff Engineer program to spread new technical practices quickly.
 

Our technical culture is pragmatic, outcome-oriented, and deeply customer-focused. Our CTO describes it as "very pragmatic and very outcome oriented" — we hire people who are good at thinking about the business problem and the product problem and actually getting things done.


Jon, a Principal Engineer who has been at Cedar for nine years, says what distinguishes Cedar technically is a focus on root problems, not feature sets: we're trying to help patients understand and afford their bills, and that problem evolves over time, keeping us constantly relevant and ahead of competitors who are optimising fixed feature sets. Engineers at Cedar are expected to have high autonomy — to understand how the business works, what challenges patients face, and to take initiative on solutions without waiting to be told what to build.
 

Innovation Pace
Tools & Technology Quality
Adoption of Emerging Tech

Cedar's unique position in the healthcare technology landscape is worth understanding: we are not a young startup without deep domain knowledge, nor are we a legacy incumbent resistant to change. We are a ten-year-old, tech-native company that deeply understands healthcare workflows, is now leveraging AI across our product and engineering practices, and has the data to do it well — over 1.5 billion patient interactions.


As our Chief Product Officer describes it: "Every interaction within Cedar actually makes the system smarter." That compounding intelligence is a moat that newer entrants can't replicate quickly.
 

Cedar Employee Perspectives

What is the unique story that you feel your company has with AI? If you were writing about it, what would the title of your blog be?
Cedar’s AI story is one that’s familiar to all of us — the patients who face the nearly universal experience of receiving healthcare and managing what comes next: the bill. To deeply understand these needs, my team built a large language model-powered pipeline that transcribes and parses thousands of patient call recordings to gather the insights and data that fuel our AI voice agent, Kora. Kora provides patients with comprehensive and compassionate medical billing support, delivering personalized guidance on everything from balance inquiries to payment options — even when patients can’t fully articulate their problem.

Our blog title would be: “The AI That Listens When You Don’t Know What to Say.” Healthcare billing is an area where users are often confused, anxious and unsure of the exact problem they are facing. It’s why building AI for healthcare is different from typical consumer applications. Our patients aren’t looking for a specific product code or a simple return process — they need guidance, diagnosis and a path to resolution.

 

What was a monumental moment for your team when it comes to your work with AI?
One monumental moment occurred last year, when we released our AI chat assistant and were overwhelmed by positive feedback from the users of the product — call center agents who provided billing support to patients. We were excited to have the chance to speak with the call center agents during our over-the-shoulder sessions, where we observed how these individuals were using our new AI tools to supercharge their workflows.

We knew that we had something special when an agent exclaimed, “That’s exactly what we need. I couldn’t have said it better myself!” upon seeing an AI-generated suggestion to a patient inquiry. The qualitative feedback from call center agents and patients, along with the numbers that illustrated the efficiency gains brought by our solution, gave us the conviction we needed to double down on Cedar’s AI investment and make AI central to how we solve patient problems.

 

AI is a constantly evolving field. Very few people coming into these roles have years of experience to pull from. Explain what continuous learning looks like on your team. How do you learn from one another and collaborate?

Experience is helpful, but we also value persistence, creativity and problem-solving. Our strong team of applied AI scientists not only have deep expertise in AI, but many of them also have exposure to different aspects of healthcare billing, such as insurance claims data. That knowledge, paired with a drive to solve complex problems for patients and clients, is invaluable. We also welcomed a PhD fellow earlier this year, recognizing the importance of fresh perspectives. We’re also now hiring for a staff applied AI scientist.

What sets our team apart is our commitment to learning and collaboration. In our recent prompt tuning retro, we reflected on our experimentation process, surfaced insights and pain points, and outlined action items around tooling, workflows and architecture exploration.

Our weekly brainstorms are another cornerstone — providing space to share ideas and feedback at every stage, from experiment design to results review. This spirit of collaboration is what drives us to solve healthcare’s toughest AI challenges.

Sumayah Rahman
Sumayah Rahman, Director of Applied AI/ML

Describe a project you’re especially eager to tackle in the new year.

In the new year, I’m excited to keep advancing Kora, our AI agent for patient billing support. Many people still prefer the phone when they have questions about their medical bills, and those calls often happen at stressful moments. We’ve already seen how Kora can make these conversations clearer and faster by authenticating callers, gathering the right context and resolving questions that map to cases AI can safely handle. The team and I are going to build on that foundation and continue improving how Kora prepares information for human agents so they can focus on the more complex cases. For me, this project is about giving patients quick, accurate answers, expanding Kora’s capability to respond to increasingly difficult and varied questions, and helping agents get the clarity they need to support someone well.

 

What technologies and/or practices is your team leveraging to tackle this project?

We’re building on the combination of high-quality AI models and Cedar’s deep infrastructure of integrations, billing logic and patient-specific data. We can’t script every answer because people ask follow-up questions that take calls in many directions, so we rely on AI systems that can stay within the right data and guidelines while responding naturally. To ensure safety, we use simulation, where Kora practices with an AI acting as the patient; perform a human review of selected calls; follow deterministic metrics that show how people move through the flow of a call; and employ AI-driven issue detection that flags outliers. Recently, we shifted toward giving the AI more freedom in phrasing, as long as it stays accurate, and we’ve already seen more patients completing flows and saying, “That’s all I needed.”

 

How does this project tie into larger company goals?

This work directly supports Cedar’s mission to empower us all to easily and affordably pursue the care we need. By letting Kora resolve appropriate questions and prepare the essential context before handing off to an agent, we’ve reduced handle times up to 25 percent, even with the complexity of healthcare calls. As more providers come online and call volumes grow, continuing to mature Kora helps Cedar deliver clear, dependable, patient-centered support at scale with the level of accuracy people deserve when dealing with their healthcare bills.

What tools support your day-to-day work?

Three or four years ago, most of our tooling was about helping developers write code faster, manually. That problem has shifted completely. Now the question is: How do you best direct coding agents to do work well?

At Cedar, we've moved from GitHub Copilot to Cursor to Claude Code as our primary agentic development platform and what I appreciate is that Cedar hasn't chased tools for the sake of it. There's a term called "token maxing" — basically pushing developers to use as much AI as possible regardless of whether it's actually productive. Cedar has never done that. But they've also never been slow to move when something genuinely better comes along.

Beyond the coding tools themselves, context has become just as important as the code. We use a tool called Glean to search across our codebase, Slack messages and Google Workspace. Before I spin up an agent on a new feature, I'll use Glean to surface product requirements, old design docs, Confluence threads — anything that explains the thinking behind an existing product. I can come up to speed on something as though I've worked on it for years.

 

How does your team experiment?

We experiment with new technology in a few structured ways and one of the most valuable is Maker Innovation Day — a monthly dedicated day where anyone in product, design, or engineering can go explore a new idea or investigate a new tool. The only rule is that you share what you learn.

I've taken almost every one of my Maker Innovation days and hyper-focused on agentic development. In that space I've built internal MCP servers that connect our development workflows to our Snowflake databases and I've built coding harnesses that let Claude Code investigate the database, investigate multiple repos, generate full project plans and then actually implement them. That kind of infrastructure doesn't get built during a sprint. It needs a dedicated day and permission to take a real risk.

The AI Guild came out of that same energy. We formed it about a year ago and from it spawned a monthly AI Coding Workshop — no slides, show working code. Walk people through using Cursor, then Claude Code, then MCP servers. Real steps, live in front of everyone. That spawned Slack channels, follow-up conversations and a whole internal community. It has meaningfully expanded who can ship at Cedar.

 

How does your company adapt to change?

Cedar's approach to change is simple: they listen to the people actually doing the work. Kora, our conversational AI voice agent for medical billing, didn't come from a top-down mandate. They got a team of engineers and product people together, let them canvas the market and trusted them to land on a modern approach. While most companies were still running touch-tone phone trees, Cedar shipped an AI-first voice agent. That happened because they gave the team the room to find the best solution rather than dictating one.

It’s been the same pattern to evolve our development tooling. Cedar runs multi-month pilot programs, includes the developers who do the work, throws out what isn't landing and adopts what is. That flywheel is how we have adopted different tools without losing momentum.

What I find most interesting is how this shapes team dynamics. The Venn diagram of designers, product managers and engineers at Cedar has been collapsing. Designers are shipping code updates through pull request review. Product managers are closer to technical work than ever. We're all in each other's work in a way that lets us move much faster because Cedar was willing to invest in the tools and the culture that made it possible.

Cedar's Tech Stack

AWS (Amazon Web Services)
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
SERVICES
Cypress
Cypress
FRAMEWORKS
Django
Django
FRAMEWORKS
Docker
Docker
FRAMEWORKS
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
DATABASES
GitHub
GitHub
SERVICES
GraphQL
GraphQL
FRAMEWORKS
JavaScript
JavaScript
LANGUAGES
Jest
Jest
FRAMEWORKS
Kafka
Kafka
FRAMEWORKS
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
DATABASES
Python
Python
LANGUAGES
React
React
LIBRARIES
Redux
Redux
LIBRARIES
Snowflake
Snowflake
DATABASES
TypeScript
TypeScript
LANGUAGES
Go
Go
LANGUAGES
Jenkins
Jenkins
SERVICES
Sentry
Sentry
SERVICES
Datadog
Datadog
SERVICES
Cursor
Cursor
SERVICES
PyCharm
PyCharm
SERVICES
VS Code
VS Code
SERVICES
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
SERVICES
React
React
FRAMEWORKS
Pytest
Pytest
FRAMEWORKS
Apollo
Apollo
LIBRARIES
Graphene
Graphene
LIBRARIES
Asana
Asana
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Illustrator
Illustrator
DESIGN
JIRA
JIRA
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Photoshop
Photoshop
DESIGN
Zeplin
Zeplin
DESIGN
HubSpot
HubSpot
CRM
Salesforce
Salesforce
CRM
Wagtail
Wagtail
CMS
Terminus
Terminus
LEAD GEN
LinkedIn Campaign Manager
LinkedIn Campaign Manager
LEAD GEN
Asana
Asana
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Slack
Slack
COLLABORATION
Zoom
Zoom
COLLABORATION
Jira
Jira
PROJECT MANAGEMENT