Unlike conventional cyberattacks, which aim for quick and obvious results, advanced persistent threats focus on maintaining continuous access to a system. This enables attackers to steal sensitive data, monitor network activity and exploit vulnerabilities over time.
What Are the Hallmarks of an APT?
Advanced persistent threats have long-term objectives to disrupt operations. They’re stealthy, persistent, resourceful, sophisticated and adaptable.
How Does an Advanced Persistent Threat Attack Work?
An APT attack typically starts with extensive reconnaissance to understand the target’s network, security posture and possible weak points in their defense. Attackers often use social engineering techniques to gain initial access, although these groups do typically have the technical ability to launch more sophisticated attacks.
Once inside, they employ various methods to escalate privileges and move laterally across the network. The ultimate goal of these groups is to establish multiple points of persistence, making it difficult for defenders to detect and eradicate the threat. It’s the cybersecurity equivalent of playing hide and seek, but with much higher stakes.
Stages of an Advanced Persistent Threat Attack
APTs generally unfold in several stages.
- Initial compromise: Attackers gain entry into the network through phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, or using stolen credentials. This stage is the cyber equivalent of an attacker picking the lock to get into the house.
- Establish foothold: Attackers use malware or backdoors to maintain access and establish persistence, leaving a figurative window open for easy re-entry.
- Escalation of privileges: Attackers elevate their privileges to access additional parts of the network. The better privileges they have within a network, the more insight and power they have over their target.
- Internal reconnaissance: Attackers gather detailed information about the network to identify valuable targets. This is when the attackers are “casing” the network to find weak links or exploitable information.
- Lateral movement: Attackers move laterally within the network to access additional systems and data, taking advantage of any areas within the network that can be accessed adjacently.
- Data exfiltration: Attackers collect sensitive data and transfer it out of the network. They’re able to make off with their loot at this point.
- Cleanup: Attackers cover their tracks and remove evidence of the attack. They wipe their digital fingerprints and any other evidence that they were ever there.
Characteristics of an APT Attack
APTs are defined by a few key characteristics.
Stealth and Persistence
Attackers design APTs to remain undetected for long periods, often using advanced evasion techniques. This contrasts with many other attacks, where the primary concern is to achieve the objective as quickly as possible, even if it results in detection.
Resourcefulness
Attackers are well-funded and have significant resources, often backed by nation-states or organized crime. It’s like having a wealthy benefactor bank roll their hacking.
Sophistication
These attacks involve complex, customized malware and advanced exploitation techniques. The attackers behind APTs are often highly skilled, well-funded and supported by significant resources, enabling them to develop sophisticated, custom malware, exploit zero-day vulnerabilities and employ advanced evasion techniques.
Long-term Objectives
The primary purpose of an APT attack is to achieve long-term access to a target network to gather intelligence or disrupt operations. Unlike financially motivated cybercrimes that seek immediate rewards, APTs are often driven by political, strategic or economic objectives.
For instance, nation-state actors might target government agencies to gain intelligence or sabotage critical infrastructure, while corporate espionage groups might aim to steal proprietary information to gain a competitive edge.
Adaptability
Attackers continuously evolve their tactics to bypass new security measures and maintain their presence. They’re like chameleons, blending into the background to evade detection.
The strategic nature of APTs, coupled with their resource-intensive operations, makes them one of the most challenging threats to defend against in the cybersecurity landscape.
Advanced Persistent Threat Examples
Cybersecurity researchers often assign APT groups unique nicknames, typically based on their patterns of behavior, origins or specific traits. These names usually serve as shorthand for identifying specific threats, adding a layer of storytelling to the world of cybersecurity.
The following high-profile APTs illustrate the threat posed by these sophisticated attacks.
Comment Crew (APT1)
Believed to be linked to the Chinese government, APT1 has targeted industries worldwide, including aerospace, telecommunications and energy. In one instance, they infiltrated a major aerospace company and exfiltrated sensitive data over several years, giving new meaning to the term “taking flight.”
The name Comment Crew comes from the group’s unique habit of using web comments embedded in legitimate websites to communicate with their malware. This sneaky tactic allowed them to blend in with regular internet traffic, masking their operations.
Fancy Bear (APT28)
Associated with Russian intelligence, APT28 has conducted numerous espionage campaigns against NATO countries and political organizations. During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, they hacked into the Democratic National Committee and leaked sensitive information, creating a political bear trap that had lasting ramifications.
The “bear” in their name is a common theme used to refer to Russian-based hacking groups, much like bears are often symbolic of Russia itself. The “fancy” part is more lighthearted, reflecting the sophisticated and often flashy tactics the group uses in their operations.
Cozy Bear (APT29)
Another Russian group, APT29 is known for its attacks on government institutions, including the infamous 2016 U.S. Democratic National Committee breach. They’re like the other side of the same coin of APT28, proving that two bears are definitely worse than one.
The name follows the “bear” naming convention of other Russian-backed groups, and the “cozy” in their name is emblematic of the group’s focus on quietly embedding itself into networks, like a bear cozying up in a den for a long winter. While Fancy Bear might ransack the pantry, Cozy Bear slowly sneaks in, settles down and makes itself comfortable without you noticing until it’s too late.
Elfin (APT33)
Linked to Iran, APT33 has targeted organizations in the aerospace, energy and petrochemical sectors, primarily in the Middle East. In 2017, APT33 conducted a series of cyber espionage activities against companies involved in oil production and military aviation, seeking to gain strategic insights and potentially disrupt operations.
This APT’s nickname stems from its use of a nimble and evasive malware toolkit that operates much like an elusive elf, slipping in and out of networks without drawing attention. The nickname captures the group’s agility and stealth, essential characteristics of their cyber operations.
Operation Cloud Hopper (APT10)
APT10, associated with the Chinese government, targeted managed IT service providers (MSPs) to gain indirect access to their clients, including numerous multinational companies. This tactic allowed them to infiltrate a wide array of industries, from finance to manufacturing, without directly attacking each company.
The name Cloud Hopper underscores their preference for using cloud environments to extend their reach and impact — a classic case of hopping between systems, leaving no data safe in the process.
Lazarus Group (APT38)
Linked to North Korea, APT38 is known for its bold and financially motivated attacks, including the infamous Sony Pictures hack in 2014. They used sophisticated malware to steal and leak confidential information, causing significant financial and reputational damage.
More recently, they’ve been involved in large-scale cryptocurrency thefts, making a digital dash for the cash. Their nickname stems from the biblical figure Lazarus, who was famously raised from the dead. This APT group’s operations often seem to rise from the ashes after major takedowns, coming back with new tactics and attacks.
How to Prevent an Advanced Persistent Threat
Preventing APT attacks requires a multi-layered, defense in depth security approach.
- Advanced threat detection: Implement sophisticated monitoring tools to detect anomalies and potential intrusions. It’s like having a security guard that never sleeps.
- Patch management: Regularly update software and systems to close vulnerabilities that attackers might exploit. Think of it as fixing the locks on your house to prevent unwelcome intruders.
- Network segmentation: Divide the network into isolated segments to limit lateral movement. It’s the digital equivalent of having multiple locked doors within the house.
- User Education: Train employees to recognize phishing attempts and other social engineering tactics. Knowledge is power, and in this case it’s a strong defense.
- Incident response plan: Develop and regularly test a comprehensive incident response plan to quickly contain and mitigate attacks. This is like having a fire drill for cyber emergencies.
- Zero-trust architecture: Adopt a zero-trust approach where you trust no entity by default and require continuous verification. Trust no one, verify everyone.
Advanced persistent threats represent a formidable challenge in cybersecurity. Their sophisticated, stealthy and persistent nature makes them a significant concern for organizations worldwide.
By understanding how these attacks work, recognizing their characteristics and implementing robust preventive measures, organizations can better protect themselves against these relentless adversaries.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of an APT attack?
The primary purpose of an APT attack is to achieve long-term access to a target network to gather intelligence or disrupt operations.
What makes an APT different from other cyberattacks?
Unlike financially motivated cybercrimes that seek immediate rewards, APTs are often driven by political, strategic or economic objectives. For instance, nation-state actors might target government agencies to gain intelligence or sabotage critical infrastructure, while corporate espionage groups might aim to steal proprietary information to gain a competitive edge.
