Nasdaq
Nasdaq Compensation & Benefits
This page summarizes recurring themes identified from responses generated by popular LLMs to common candidate questions about Nasdaq and has not been reviewed or approved by Nasdaq.
How are the compensation & benefits at Nasdaq?
Strengths in retirement support and total-rewards design (bonus and equity components) are accompanied by challenges in consistent base-pay growth and perceived market alignment across teams and geographies. Together, these dynamics suggest the package can be compelling on total value while still leaving pockets of dissatisfaction where progression and benchmarking expectations are higher.
Key Insight for Candidates
Defining tradeoff: Nasdaq leans on strong benefits, especially a 6% 401(k) match and meaningful equity, while base pay and raises are relatively conservative. This means total comp feels solid if you value retirement savings and stock, but cash-focused candidates may find slower salary growth and below-peak base.Evidence in Action
- Equity-Weighted Pay Mix — Annual bonuses and stock grants/ESPP are standard components of total compensation at Nasdaq, with perceived competitiveness tracking company performance and vesting timelines. Employees depend on variable pay to feel competitive, which can offset base lag but introduces year-to-year volatility.
- 6% 401(k) Match — The U.S. 401(k) plan provides a 100% company match on the first 6% of pay contributed, a documented program detail. This reliably boosts total rewards and long-term savings, making benefits a meaningful part of take-home value.
Positive Themes About Nasdaq
-
Retirement Support: Retirement support is positioned as a standout, with a dollar-for-dollar 401(k) match up to a stated percentage for U.S. employees. This feature is repeatedly framed as strong versus common market norms and a meaningful component of total rewards.
-
Equity Value & Accessibility: Equity and stock-related programs are described as standard and meaningful parts of total compensation. The overall value is tied to grant cadence and vesting, making the equity component a material driver of perceived competitiveness.
-
Strong & Reliable Incentives: Annual bonuses and other variable-pay elements are presented as standard components that can materially lift total compensation beyond base salary. The incentive-heavy structure is portrayed as beneficial when company performance and payout mechanics align with expectations.
Considerations About Nasdaq
-
Stagnant Pay & Limited Progression: Pay growth is portrayed as uneven, with difficulty scaling compensation through promotions or raises in some areas. Progression speed appears to vary by team, creating inconsistent experiences in salary growth over time.
-
Unfair & Opaque Compensation: Compensation competitiveness is depicted as highly sensitive to role, level, and location, producing wide dispersion that can feel misaligned depending on the benchmark used. This variability contributes to mixed perceptions of whether pay is truly market-aligned.
NEW
What does AI tell candidates about your employer brand?
Get your free AI reputation report today.
See AI Report
Nasdaq Insights
Is This Your Company?
Claim Profile
